Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SHough610's avatar

I saw the Holdovers the day after I saw the Killer and expected to like the latter much more than the former. I was wrong.

It’s a cliche to describe a movie as a throwback but sometimes a cliche is a cliche for a reason. The Holdovers feels like a movie from the early 70’s adapted from a popular early 70’s novel.

The Holdovers is delightful in a way few movies are today. It is a prestige movie, I guess, but it is not about Big, Important Events™️ or a Searing Issue™️ (not that those things are inherently bad). It is about people and the connections we make.

It’s not a movie that will inspire endless think pieces and it doesn’t feel like a vain appeal to Boomer nostalgia. I assume it’s set in the 1970’s because that’s the last time a boarding school student could be likable.

This might seem like I’m damning the movie with faint praise but it’s the first movie I’ve walked out of in a long, long time that made me say, “I wish they made movies like this more often.”

Expand full comment
Wes Lawson's avatar

Something Ebert said in his review of Sideways that really stuck with me is "all the characters are necessary." True again here. Not every movie needs to have top-to-bottom three-dimensional characters with arcs, but so many indie dramas and award season contenders hire great actors to play people who are only there to serve plot functions. Even Carrie Preston, who's the closest thing this one has to a character like that, immediately and perfectly establishes the kind of person she is, and gets a couple of good scenes.

Great movie, fully cried when Da'Vine opened the hat box. My husband and I were the youngest people in the audience by 20 years. At least three phone alarms went off, and a lady down the aisle REALLY wanted to sing along to the songs she knew.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts